The Giving Movement#
by Melody Brooke, MA, Conflict Coach, Motivational Speaker

Giving?

Over the past year I have been listening to a lot of people talk about the need for giving as a spiritual path. Authors are writing books, conducting lectures, even hosting radio shows. Oprah has introduced "The Big Give" game show where earnest competitors strive to be the one to give the most in a few days time.

Of course the injunction to give is not new by any stretch. For generations churches have implored us to give money and time to build the church and the churches services. For generations we have given, we have built churches and we have built foundations, charities, and funds to help those less fortunate.

And of course, Zig Zigler, who is now 81 years young has been saying “You can get everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want.” since 1984. He's right, of course, because helping others builds trust and establishes ourselves as having value to the other person. When we have value to others we are more likely to get what we want.

What is Giving really about?

Helping others and giving to others feels good and ultimately lifts us out of our shame. It allows us to feel worthy and others appreciate us.

Of course, if we don't give, we are subtly (sometimes not so subtly) told we are takers and should be ashamed of ourselves. This shame hooks into an old sense of shame that we may have carried with us since childhood. So we give because we don't want to feel that shame. Then we give again because giving just lifts us temporarily out of the shame, it doesn't fix it. The cycle of feeling shame then giving then feeling shame and then giving never ends.

People who preach "Giving"

What I am tired of us people who preach giving and are takers themselves. Typically, this is the "preacher" who takes money for prayers that he never sees and lives in a multi-million dollar mansion. It's typical of "socialites" who raise money for charities and pay for their designer clothes with the funds they collect.

The hypocrisy of it irks me, but I do have compassion for them. I know they are doing the best they can, because they themselves feel horrid about themselves. The only way their feel their lives have merit is if they obtain the financial and social status other's "giving" does for them. That really is very sad.

Oprah's Giving

We all love how much Oprah gives and we admire her delightfully refreshing attitude of giving that so few billionaires express. I love so much about her, but I also see her gaining weight again. She has expressed a knowledge that this is emotional and about her having not gotten to a place of self love. What I know is that if we are not fully in a place of self love then we are in the Victim place. Being in the Victim place means feeling shame and powerless, going into a Rescuer mode and giving to others can relieve that pain for a while. Of course, Oprah has so much money and so many resources she could spend the rest of her days giving, most of us would like to see that continue. Personally, I wish for her that she could look at what motivates her giving and deal with the unwarranted shame that is undoubtedly underneath.

Irony.

One of the ironies in all this clap trap about "giving" is the idea I have often heard preached that we Americans are "all about me" and "materialistic". Yet there is no other country that gives so much per capita as the United States. We give through our budget to provide foreign aid, we give through our churches, our corporations give, our foundations give, and individually we give more than any other nation in the world. Yet I continually hear about how focused we are on ourselves. We are a nation of Rescuer's in fact.

Does giving have to come from shame?

What if we got out of our shame and gave from an entirely different place? What would that look like? I don't think those slimy preachers would live so high on the hog. I think more money would actually go to helping people. We'd spend less time focusing on getting more for ourselves, too, because we would not feel the need to prove our value.Now that really does change everything.

Are you a Giver? Why?

I'd love to hear your thoughts about this pet peeve of mine. It is not fashionable right now to question this new "giving movement." But it's not the giving I have an issue with, it's why we do it, and who do we think we are judging those who don't choose to give as being "less than"? Shame builds upon shame when we do this to others. Its shame we don't deserve. Comment below.

As a note:

I give more than 30% of my fees to clients who cannot afford to pay their full fee. I don't give a lot to "charities" and I don't spend a lot of time wondering if I should give more. I give to these clients because it makes me feel good to see them get better. I have a lot more to say about the "giving movement" so check in later for more.

Sunday, March 16, 2008 1:10:59 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) #    Comments [2]  | 
Sunday, March 30, 2008 12:37:18 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)

What tires me is the new wave of conspicuious public giving. If I had a dime for every name on every shiny brass plaque or carved brick on even the most minute new public feature in my town I would be...well...as wealthy as I suspect the people whose names I see there are.

The unfortunate impression this gives is that such individuals are willing to contribute to the public good only on the condition they can be assured that a visable public notation of their benevolence will be installed on site to be pushed in the face of every passerby for generations to come.

When observing garden variety graffiti in my youth, my mother would often repeat a chant I suspect she learned in her own childhood:

"Fool's names and fool's faces are often seen in public places."

This form of giving, ironically linked to what amounts to an increasingly inescapable wave of officially sanctioned public graffiti, only contributes to the atmosphere of public clutter and ever-growing sensory overload that has rapidly come to dominate this phase of American culture.

It seems that the era of gracious public giving is quickly slipping behind us, and this particular population of contemporary givers have come to expect expect quite a bit more than the simple personal satisfaction of "doing good."
Robert Johnson
Sunday, March 30, 2008 1:01:04 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
"Fools" for sure. The need to have others see you as being better than you, yourself, think that you are is the definition of a "rescuer". I love Oprah but I do wish she could know how awesome she is without having to prove it to the world!

"Doing good" is not really the goal... when the point is to feel better about yourself in the process. Of course the implication is that YOU shouldn't feel good about yourself unless YOU are giving as much and in the same ways... Thanks for the comments...
Comments are closed.
All content © 2008, Melody Brooke All rights reserved
Listen to Melody
put Oh Wow
to the Test

LIVE Internet radio!

Thursdays
NOON ET / 9AM PT
Change Faster
Share It Live
Need More than Words?
On this page
This site
Calendar
<November 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456
Archives
Sitemap
Blogroll OPML
Disclaimer

Powered by: newtelligence dasBlog 2.0.7226.0

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

Theme design by Mike Henricks